Public claim audit
Verified specialist (named-equipment evidence · specialist subcategory)
- Scope
- v2 facet schema
- Lens version
- v0.4.7
- Claim id
- 7be845c7-3ea6-43c5-892c-7a8da93b422b
Co-presence claim
Verified specialist (named-equipment evidence · specialist subcategory)
Scope: v2 facet schema
Scan date: 2026-08-11
Decomposition — atomic inputs
A1Named equipment brands: bridgeport, kitamura
agent“Our 7 x Kitamura horizontal machining centres have the versatility to cut materials at high speeds of up to 15000rpm or at low speed/high torque applications required for difficult materials. ... 4 x Kitamura Hx400G Machining Centres ... 3 x Kitamura Hx250iG Machining Centres 1 x Bridgeport 1000 VMC”
A2Specialist subcategory: large_envelope
agent“Our 7 x Kitamura horizontal machining centres have the versatility to cut materials at high speeds of up to 15000rpm or at low speed/high torque applications required for difficult materials. CNC machined components within a 430mm x 430mm x 400 mm machining envelope can be offered.”
Version history
- v1Superseded2026-08-07
Verified specialist (named-equipment evidence · specialist subcategory)
View this version’s audit page → - v2Superseded2026-08-09
Verified specialist (named-equipment evidence · specialist subcategory)
View this version’s audit page → - v3Supersededthis page2026-08-11
Verified specialist (named-equipment evidence · specialist subcategory)
- v4Superseded2026-08-13
Verified specialist (named-equipment evidence · specialist subcategory)
View this version’s audit page → - v5Superseded2026-08-18
Verified specialist (named-equipment evidence · specialist subcategory)
View this version’s audit page → - v6Superseded2026-08-19
Verified specialist (named-equipment evidence · specialist subcategory)
View this version’s audit page → - v7Active2026-08-20
Verified specialist (named-equipment evidence · specialist subcategory)
View this version’s audit page →
Dispute log
No disputes have been filed against this claim.
Disputes are public by design — this log is the publisher’s responsiveness record. Disputer identity is never shown: anonymous disputes are keyed by a one-way fingerprint hash that is not published; verified-owner disputes show only “verified owner”.